Cengiz Aksu vs Kaan Cepel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Aksu vs Cepel analysis and find out who is favored!
Cengiz Aksu vs Kaan Cepel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Aksu 1 - 0 Cepel
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Aksu has won 47.76% of points on their second serve, while Cepel has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Aksu, in recent form, has won 55.52% of their opponent's second serve points, while Cepel has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.79% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Aksu has saved 52.78% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cepel has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Aksu has won 48.72% of matches played (W/L 19/ 20), with Cepel winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Aksu has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 45/ 37), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 98/ 91). Cepel has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 22% (W/L 8/ 28), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Aksu has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 19/ 19), where as Cepel has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Aksu winning 1 times and Cepel being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Aksu winning 2 and Cepel winning 1. The last match between Aksu and Cepel was at the M15 Antalya, 03-02-2020, Q2 round, Clay with Cengiz Aksu getting the victory 7-6(1) 1-6 10-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Aksu and Cepel have played a deciding set 1 times, with Aksu winning 1 times and Cepel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Aksu winning 1, and Cepel 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Aksu has played against opponents with an average rank of 99.13 while Cepel has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Aksu has won 36% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cepel has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Aksu has converted 50% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cepel has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Cengiz Aksu
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
Kaan Cepel
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
Form
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
53% (143-128)
Career Total W/L
22% (8-29)
53% (9-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Cengiz Aksu | Kaan Cepel |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 18 | 14 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(1) 1-6 10-2 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Cengiz Aksu | Kaan Cepel |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 53% (9/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 54% (20/17) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 52% (177/165) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 50% (8/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.1 | 0 |
Aces Total | 17 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.19 | 0 |
DFs Total | 31 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:28:21 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 59.41 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 66% (597/903) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 63% (378/597) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 47% (144/306) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 52% (50/96) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 43% (401/930) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 53% (9/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 53% (9/17) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (8/8) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (8/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 11% (9/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Cengiz Aksu Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Cengiz Aksu
Player
Robin Bertrand
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Darius Florin Pop
Player
Cengiz Aksu
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve %
78%
(
46 of
59)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
8 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Kokoro Isomura
Player
Cengiz Aksu
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve %
72%
(
31 of
43)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cengiz Aksu
Player
Kanan Gasimov
62%
(
84 of
136)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
111)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
8
67%
(
56 of
84)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
35%
(
18 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
75%
(
9 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
46%
(
62 of
136)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
59 of
111)
133
Total Points Won
114
|
6-7(2) 7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
Player
Cengiz Aksu
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cengiz Aksu
Player
Viacheslav Bielinskyi
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Cengiz Aksu
Player
Hien Pham
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
76%
(
28 of
37)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
56
Total Points Won
22
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Cengiz Aksu
Player
Louis Van Herck
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
71%
(
59 of
83)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Kaan Cepel Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Thiago Agustin Tirante
Player
Kaan Cepel
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 3-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Maxime Hamou
Player
Kaan Cepel
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
69%
(
25 of
36)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
53
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 4-6 6-4 10-4 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-4 4-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 4-6 10-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H |
view more